INTP Discussion Forum > Flamethrower > On the compatibility of science and religion


Posted by: Strephonade Jun 24 2004, 11:41 PM
Wasn't quite sure where to put the beginning of this thread, but this may be the most appropriate place.... If you are very sensitive about your religion, I would advise against reading any further.

Am reading through a book titled "The Science of God" by Gerald L. Schroeder, ISBN 076790303x, which discusses reconciling faith in science with a belief that the Bible is or contains Truth. It was written by a physicist and biblical scholar, and so far has been quite interesting. Basically, the argument is that science and religion (specifically, that derived from the Bible) are not only compatible, but interdependent.

I have for quite some while regarded myself as somewhat spiritual, but not particularly religious. As it appears to me, there is likely some sort of a God in existence or non-existence, as one chooses to view it, and that this God suffuses all creatures and things on this planet. 'God' is perhaps one of an infinite number of ways to refer to this force, one of any number of names, but all referring to the same. I am curious to know how other INTPs view science through the lens of religion, and vice versa....

Posted by: Lovechild Jun 24 2004, 11:47 PM
facts and fairy tales simply don't mix...

Posted by: flan2dave Jun 25 2004, 03:15 AM
Many brilliant scientists, including Einstein, considered their work as a process of discovering the mind of god.

Posted by: KentOhio Jun 25 2004, 03:21 AM
I'm a Catholic (a real one, not a Teddy Kennedy or John Kerry- style Catholic,) and I haven't ever seen a conflict between science and religion. After all, both science and religion are about understanding "how" and "why." The answers from both seem to point to the existance of God.

Posted by: CosmicDust Jun 25 2004, 03:35 AM
I'm not into religion, but I am interested in spirituality. I've read some books about the biology of spirituality, and now I'm reading a contemporary philosophical book - Spirituality for the Skeptic by Robert Solomon. It's quite interesting. Religion is described in that book as more of about belonging than anything else, with the sacred phrases and dogmas being special club code words and the rituals being group activity. However, in one of the biological books, ritual was described as being a way to help us "get outside ourselves," loosening our ego-sense and getting us into the moment. So spirituality can be found in religion, but the two need not always go hand in hand - many people can be religious but not especially spiritual. (This is the way the authors of these books describe fanatical fundamentalists.)

Anyway, I think spirituality is compatible with science if you don't insist on the most extreme dogmatic limitations on either one. Spirituality involves an appreciation of the wholes in life. Science involves a lot of scrutinizing of the parts but also rebuilding and new views of the wholes, which can be beautiful. I enjoy amateur philosophizing, trying to make sense of some spiritual ideas without abandoning materialism as at least a plausible worldview. For instance, I think of mind and soul as dynamics, complicated patterns within the greater pattern of the Universe. Also, there's the somewhat comforting notion that the Universe will go on, merely changing form; Everything is beyond the limits of time since it includes even time itself. If I think of myself as part of the Universe, I get some of that fear-reducing consolation for the fact that I'm gonna die and don't believe that anything resembling my mind will continue once my body dies.

I think being too literal about interpretation of religious text, or being too closed off to exploration of things stigmatized as "spiritual airy fairy crap" in the name of science, results in a rather stagnant worldview, working against the appreciation of wholes that makes life more than merely bearable.

Posted by: nobarcode Jun 25 2004, 06:02 AM
QUOTE (Lovechild @ Jun 24 2004, 04:47 PM)
facts and fairy tales simply don't mix...

You know...(I don't mean any offense), without giving examples of what you mean in regards to facts and fairy tales and providing any amount of informantion to substantiate them, it's hard to consider your contribution. In other words, what are you talking about?

QUOTE
Many brilliant scientists, including Einstein, considered their work as a process of discovering the mind of god.


I believe this to be true. I have not read "The Science of God", but I did read a book called "God and the New Physics". Physics has done quite a bit to establish a basis for spirituality.

Capernicus considered himself Christian, but when he discovered that Earth was not the center of the universe, he was persecuted by the "Chruch", which in those times held alot of political clout. To me, this is a prime example of how "religion/politics" does not match with "spirituality".

I do think "science" goes hand in hand with "religion/spirituality". Wilhelm Reich comes to mind as one who contributed to bridging the gap.

"Reich came to the United States in 1939 where he continued to study the manifestations and laws of orgone energy and to invent ways to make this energy usable. In 1954, the Federal Food and Drug Administration obtained an Injunction by default which ordered Reich's literature to be banned and destroyed. As a result, several tons of Reich's published books and journals were burned, constituting one of the most heinous acts of censorship in U.S. history. In his defense, Reich asserted to the Court that "Man's right to know, to learn, to inquire, to make bona fide errors, to investigate human emotions must, by all means, be safe, if the word FREEDOM should ever be more than an empty political slogan." The Court rejected this defense and Reich was convicted of contempt of court and imprisoned in Lewisburg Penitentiary where he died on November 3, 1957." http://www.wilhelmreichmuseum.org/

Posted by: Division56 Jun 25 2004, 12:56 PM
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that may never be questioned.




And that's all I have to say about that.

Posted by: Vagabond Jun 25 2004, 03:39 PM
Well I think many people identify religion with church (and priests etc...). That, in my opinion, is a mistake. Yes priests are supposed to be the most accurate representatives of religion, in my experience though most of them are just into it for the easy job. I see no conflict between science and religion/spirituality/whatever you call it. Science basically tries to explain and discover what is actually already there, in nature, not why nature is there in the first place. God or spirituality is an area which cannot be proven though, so I guess it falls under the district of theory mostly. But what we can't prove right isn't necessarily wrong, unless we can prove it wrong; yes, I am sceptical about what I cannot see, but I am not rejecting it.

If God exists though, he would be the creator, while science would be the effort (wrong expression, I am sure, but you know what I mean) to understand what is created and how it works. No conflict there for me.

Posted by: int Jun 25 2004, 04:14 PM
Dan Brown's Angels and Demons dealt with this, and since I recently finished it it's on the top of my mind. You might want to check it out. I normally don't like to read fiction, but got through this one regardless. Although, I was in Rome at the time. wink.gif

Posted by: Division56 Jun 25 2004, 05:07 PM
Many of you argue that religion and science never touch because god can't be proved ect....

But, I argue that religion makes dozens of other half-asses promises that aren't true. It's not all about gods. There are even a few atheistic religions (taoism, budhism, ect...).

Posted by: paladinoflunaria Jun 28 2004, 04:24 AM
Treading on thin ice these religious discussions are. Oh well.

QUOTE
I'm not into religion, but I am interested in spirituality.


Same here.

QUOTE
I enjoy amateur philosophizing, trying to make sense of some spiritual ideas without abandoning materialism as at least a plausible worldview.


Me too. Cosmic Dust, this book you are reading intrigues me.

QUOTE
But, I argue that religion makes dozens of other half-asses promises that aren't true. It's not all about gods. There are even a few atheistic religions (taoism, budhism, ect...).


Could you present a few of those promises that Buddhism asserts? I am baptized Catholic, but I've been reading up on Buddhism and I find it interesting because it tries
QUOTE
to make sense of some spiritual ideas without abandoning materialism as at least a plausible worldview
. That is the middle path. Perhaps some of the practices of some Buddhists stray from this middle path, but that doesn't mean that the whole philosophy is crap. I encourage everyone to read up on Buddhism and find any mistakes, contradictions, etc., for while I am interested in it, I am open to the fact that it could be wrong.

Posted by: Spartan26 Jun 28 2004, 09:25 AM
QUOTE (Division56 @ Jun 25 2004, 12:56 PM)
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.
Religion is answers that may never be questioned.

And that's all I have to say about that.

OK, looks like you made ANOTHER comment after this one. Ironically, having to do with keeping promises...
QUOTE
But, I argue that religion makes dozens of other half-asses promises that aren't true. It's not all about gods. There are even a few atheistic religions (taoism, budhism, ect...).


Huh, how 'bout we practice what we preach??? I jest.

You knew this day was coming, huh Division?

I guess Sunday night really brings out the religious posts. I hope I'll get to post this much on the Broncos when football season starts.

Addressing the first quote first, I have found my life becomes, well, I can't say my life becomes easier but I beome at ease when I surrender and accept God's will as opposed to my own. Over the years, I've gone from an an attitude of "why me" to "what am I supposed to learn from this?" Though, many a time do I shout this at God in anger and confusion.

Speaking in terms of Christianity, as that's all I know, questioning helps develop a personal relationship with God. That's generally all you'll find in the Bible, people questioning God, seeking wisdom and understanding, and receiving mercy. Under these terms, your point is correct that God's people are not to question is God soverign. After all the calamity that fell upon Job, God's response to him in his suffering is basically, 'Who are you to question Me?' Abraham, Moses, Peter, Jesus, just about everyone in the Bible had questions of God.

Quote #2 As much as I fit the 9 ennegram, it is remarkable the amount of anger and frustration I feel when I don't think God is working in my life. I feel like things should be better in my life because I'm acting in accordance to the Word. My deepest sorrows come when I feel like God has abandoned or deserted me, one promise He said He'd never do. As I am healed from some times the New Testament refers to as being pruned, I see that I wasn't deserted but things worked together for my ultimate betterment. It's really not much of a life of faith if everything comes out how we plan, when want it, as we expect it.

Now, to the original question of whether science & religion mix, I'll give the answer of yes and no. Looking at science through Christian lenses, I believe I have to guard against leaning on my own understanding, hubris, science or man's mind limits defining my existence. Of course, this is not to be mistaken with getting mauled by a bear and refusing to go to a hospital out of religous reasons.

The original book sounds more encompassing of the entire Bible, but there's a book called "The Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel that examines the evidence of the existence of Jesus. I do find it interesting to learn of how science "proves" things out of the Bible, but I don't believe things always can or should. I find it much more comfortable believing in a God who can accomplish the impossible.

Isn't that, after all, the definition of a miracle?


Posted by: int Jun 30 2004, 04:46 AM
Has anyone here read "The 'God' Part of the Brain" by Matthew Alper?

Posted by: CosmicDust Jun 30 2004, 04:12 PM
QUOTE (int @ Jun 30 2004, 12:46 AM)
Has anyone here read "The 'God' Part of the Brain" by Matthew Alper?

I have. The reductionistic approach makes a lot of sense to me. But I'm still in favor of making the most of this short existence which likely has no meaning except that assigned to it by human beings. If I'm gonna die and there's nothing in the way of conscious experience afterwards, I want to come to terms with that, and in the meantime reap some of the health benefits associated with the brain's spiritual function as mentioned in the book in order to make waiting for death less stressful.

I want there to be more to spirituality than a naive belief in ghosts and gods and afterlives that made life for my ancestors more bearable. That's what led to my reading "Spirituality for the Skeptic." The author of that book had the same stuff in mind, and I thought it would be interesting to read what another had to say on this particular matter, for affirmation, inspiration, and entertainment.